Sexualities

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Sexualities, Vol. 7, No. 2, 233-248 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1363460704042166

Sexual Antinomies in Late Modernity

Stevi Jackson

University of York, UK

Sue Scott

University of Durham, UK

It is widely assumed that late modern societies are becoming progressively more sexually liberal, regardless of whether this is seen as beneficial or not. However, ‘progress’ in this direction is, in actuality, very uneven and gives rise to a number of antinomies and associated anxieties. For example, in a society where erotic imagery is commonplace in the media, there are still enormous anxieties about preserving children’s sexual ‘innocence’ (i.e. ignorance); gay and lesbian chic exists alongside continued homophobic harassment and violence; queer destabilization of heterosexual norms co-exits with claims for inclusion into homosexual institutions; tolerance of pre-marital, even casual, sex and of marital breakdown and serial relationships coexists with intolerance of teenage pregnancy and the continuing reification of monogamy. This article will explore such tensions, raising questions about the continued ‘special status’ of sexuality and sexual relations.

Key Words: childhood sexuality • heterosexuality • monogamy • queer • sexual dysfunction


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
A. Powell
Amor fati?: Gender habitus and young people's negotiation of (hetero)sexual consent
Journal of Sociology, June 1, 2008; 44(2): 167 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
S. Budgeon
Couple Culture and the Production of Singleness
Sexualities, June 1, 2008; 11(3): 301 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Feminism PsychologyHome page
R. Gill
Empowerment/Sexism: Figuring Female Sexual Agency in Contemporary Advertising
Feminism Psychology, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 35 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
S. Jackson
Ordinary Sex
Sexualities, February 1, 2008; 11(1-2): 33 - 37.
[PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
S. Jackson and A. Rees
The Appalling Appeal of Nature: The Popular Influence of Evolutionary Psychology as a Problem for Sociology
Sociology, October 1, 2007; 41(5): 917 - 930.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Body SocietyHome page
S. Jackson and S. Scott
Faking Like a Woman? Towards an Interpretive Theorization of Sexual Pleasure
Body Society, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 95 - 116.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SexualitiesHome page
J. Frankham
Sexual Antimonies and Parent/Child Sex Education: Learning from Foreclosure
Sexualities, April 1, 2006; 9(2): 236 - 254.
[Abstract] [PDF]