This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Klesse, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Polyamory and its ‘Others’: Contesting the Terms of Non-Monogamy

Manchester Metropolitan University, UK

Drawing on qualitative in-depth interviews with bisexual-identified practitioners of polyamory in the UK, this article shows that love, intimacy and friendship are salient themes in polyamory discourses. An exploration of the question of how respondents define polyamory with regard to different ‘styles of non-monogamy’ reveals that the boundaries of polyamory are contested within the movement that has formed around this concept. The prevalent definition of polyamory as ‘responsible non-monogamy’ usually goes hand in hand with a rejection of more sex- or pleasure-centred forms of non-monogamy, such as ‘casual sex’, ‘swinging’, or ‘promiscuity’. The author argues that the salience of the relational ideologies of love and intimacy hampers the potential of polyamory to ground a truly pluralistic sexual ethics.

Key Words: friendship • intimacy • love • polyamory • promiscuity

Sexualities, Vol. 9, No. 5, 565-583 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1363460706069986


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Frank `Not Gay, but Not Homophobic': Male Sexuality and Homophobia in the `Lifestyle' Sexualities, August 1, 2008; 11(4): 435 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]