Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Sexualities
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bowditch, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

`Neverending Love' and `Blowing Your Load': The Meanings of Sex to Rural Youth

Lynne Hillier

La Trobe University

Lyn Harrison

La Trobe University

Kate Bowditch

La Trobe University

This article reports on qualitative and quantitative research, conducted with senior secondary school students in small rural Australian towns, which explored the meanings of sex and relationships. Through a survey, the researchers identified the many ways in which these young people construct meanings around sex and sexuality and, combined with their beliefs about relationships, what impact these meanings might have on their ability to negotiate safe sexual relationships. Single-sex focus discussion groups that explored aspects of developing sexuality within the context of small town culture were also held in each town. Not surprisingly, the research revealed that young people in rural areas (like many of their urban peers) assumed heterosexuality as the norm, and penis-vagina sexual intercourse as the pivotal activity in sex. Beyond this (although there was overlap), the young men and women tended to attach different meanings to sex around issues such as its place in a relationship, the pleasure it affords and the dangers it presents. There were significant gender differences in the perceived advantages and disadvantages of relationships with the expectation to have sex being seen as a deterrent for young women and an advantage for young men. We examine the common meanings of sex and the gender differences in meaning for the ways in which they might impact on young people's ability and motivation to practise safe sex, in particular, ways in which gender and power impact on sexual encounters. Finally, the article focuses on the role that sexuality education might play in helping young people critique their own understandings about sex.

Key Words: adolescence • gender • HIV/STDs • rural life • sexual health

Sexualities, Vol. 2, No. 1, 69-88 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/136346099002001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Prog Hum GeogrHome page
J. Little and M. Leyshon
Embodied rural geographies: Developing research agendas
Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2003; 27(3): 257 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
D. Gadd
Reading Between the Lines: Subjectivity and Men's Violence
Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2003; 5(4): 333 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]