This Article Full Text (PDF) Erratum for de Villiers References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by de Villiers, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How Much Does It Cost for Cinema to Tell the Truth of Sex? Cinéma Vérité and Sexography

University of Minnesota

As Foucault has shown, the Christian pastoral and modern psychiatry share a concern for sex as the truth of the subject which must be passed through `the endless mill of speech'. But what happens when the Confessional and the Couch come into contact with the Cinema? How does realist, documentary and cinéma vérité film-making modify confessional discourse? In this article, I compare Pier Paolo Pasolini's Love Meetings (Comizi d'amore) (1964) with a pair of documentaries by Wiktor Grodecki on young male prostitutes in Prague (Body Without Soul (1996) and Not Angels But Angels (1994)), Larry Clark's KIDS (1995), Paul Morrissey's Flesh (1968) and Andy Warhol's Blow Job (1963). I also consider how Jennie Livingston's Paris Is Burning (1990), in its similarity to Grodecki's and Clark's works, also departs from their (implicit) homophobia towards a critique of its own shared cinéma vérité investment in truth-telling.

Key Words: documentary cinema • homosexuality • Michel Foucault • queer theory • sex work

Sexualities, Vol. 10, No. 3, 341-361 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1363460707078336


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?